When we call them names like “biorobots” what we are really saying is that we don’t think that it’s necessary, or even possible, to understand them. We must not continue with this, because if we don’t understand them and they are hostile, then they will prevail. If they are not hostile, it is even more important that we attempt to achieve a meaningful understanding of them.
“Animals are biological robots. Very good robots because God programmed them. As with good robots they have the limited ability to adapt.”–Unnamed Ken Ham follower
When we say the word “biorobot,” we assume something simple, a kind of basic creature there only to do the bidding of its controllers. But that cannot be the case here, the reason being those larger brains. The idea, therefore, that they are simple robots must be approached with caution. They are not simple, and while they are fabricated, they may not be robots in the same sense that we mean the term.
After experiencing these biorobot coincidences, I checked Bruce Charlton’s blog and found a new post titled “The lesson of so-called AI: Most of Man's ‘thinking’ is just ‘thinking-about’, like the abstract symbolic token-juggling of Artificial Intelligence.” The post doesn’t use the word robot, but the point it is making is that most people most of the time (and many people all of the time) are limited to a sort of “thinking” that is essentially no different from what a machine could do. Bruce, too, is talking about “biological robots.” The point he is making is a very Gurdjieffian one, which is another link back to Strieber.
1 comment:
Materialism really is such a horribly insidious thing.
The Ken Ham types really have fallen victim to, if I may dredge up a Princess Bride reference, "one of the classic blunders".
In this case, it is neither about Asia nor Sicilians, but accepting the Enemy's premise before you even start contending with him.
And the worst part of the whole thing is that it reduces God and Spirit to mere tautology, which seems a far more perilous sort of blasphemy than the type they accuse the Theistic Evolution types of.
Post a Comment