is available for free on BitChute.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
White sands, red sun
Bruce Charlton recently posted on C. S. Lewis's Law of Undulation . For me, the undulation tends to be between thinking and synching. I ...
-
Following up on the idea that the pecked are no longer alone in their bodies , reader Ben Pratt has brought to my attention these remarks by... -
Artflow is an AI that creates portraits from text descriptions, and I thought it would be interesting to see how it depicted men and women ... -
I hadn't made this obvious connection until I watched this video by Jonathan Pageau, in which he gives an extremely insightful analysis ...
2 comments:
THHFA is one of those productions that I don't feel any need to watch, because it is arguing for what I already believe with high certainty ('high certainty' considering it happened elsewhere, and that I inferred what happened mainly from cross-tabulations within the broad media and across time and by provenance of information - which is a 'method' in which I don't have total confidence).
Yes, everyone who was paying attention already knew in November 2020 what had happened, at least in a general sense. What is important about THHFA is the highly concrete, easy-to-understand proof it presents. Of course, no amount of proof has been sufficient to move public opinion on the pecks, so I'm not overly hopeful.
Ironically, the film ends with a ridiculous appeal for the viewer to "get out there and vote" as a way to solve the sort of problem it documents!
Post a Comment