Thursday, April 29, 2021

The best lines get attributed to the most famous guy.

On my first day of freshman Intro to Philosophy class, the instructor opened with this: "What is truth?" -- pause for effect -- "What is truth? Do you know who first said that? Jesus. He was on trial at the time, charged with a capital crime, but that's what he said when he stood before the Roman governor: 'What is truth?' I know, I know, Pilate must have been like, You're on trial, man! I get to ask the questions! But Jesus had the right idea . . ."

And then he segued into whatever philosophical topic was first on the agenda. And no one said anything. Even I, who I'm sure was well above the average in terms of biblical literacy -- and who was generally that annoying kid who just had to raise his hand every single time the professor said anything wrong -- didn't say anything. Fact is, he rattled off the story so smoothly and naturally that for the moment I wasn't entirely sure it was wrong. The thought, "Wasn't it Pilate who said that?" did cross my mind, but not with sufficient conviction. I even entertained the idea that maybe one gospel put the words in Pilate's mouth and another in Jesus'. All in all, I just wasn't sure enough the lecturer was wrong to risk making a fool of myself by contradicting him. And neither was anyone else.

Nor do I think the lecturer was an idiot or was intentionally misquoting Jesus. He was simply telling a Bible story as he remembered it. The question "What is truth?" made him think, Hey, that's in the Bible, isn't it, when Jesus stands before Pilate? -- and he didn't bother to look it up because he knew it.

It's surprisingly easy to remember lines from a dialogue, and remember who is involved, but misremember who said which lines. (See my post "Socrates doesn't have feathers," and the self-correction in the comments, for an example of my making the same kind of mistake.)

And I don't think these errors are random. There's a natural predisposition to attribute the most memorable lines to the most memorable people. We tend to assume that Jesus, not Pilate, would produce quotable quotes that you can incorporate into an Intro to Philosophy lecture.

It's something to keep in mind when we read the Gospels. Some of the lines attributed to Jesus may well have really been said, in a conversation with Jesus, but Jesus may not have been the one who said them. In fact, it would be astonishing if no such errors had found their way into the record.

2 comments:

Bruce Charlton said...

This is part of a more general phenomenon, I think.

Tolkien had an experience with one of his poems - Errantry - entering the oral tradition and coming back to him. The result confirmed some of his existing philological theories about what typically gets preserved and what gets changed in oral transmission - e.g. some strange and difficult words were preserved when other aspects changed around them:

http://tolkiengateway.net/wiki/Letter_133

I have written about how something similar happens about proverbs and maxims - the words may remain but their meanings be reversed: such as the Midas story reversing from a terrible morality trail to meaning someone with a gift for making money; and 'shooting yourself in the foot' changing from the deliberate (but accidental-looking) self-infliction of a 'Blighty wound' in order to be evacuated away from the danger of a battlefront into an accidental self-injury that is harmful.

Tolkien deployed this insight in reconstructing corrupt texts. As we have previously discussed, there are some apparent examples in the Gospels - most significantly the episode of a woman anointing Jesus's feet which is (I think) correctly described by eyewitness "John" in the Fourth Gospel but misunderstood from reported account/s by "Luke". Some striking details are retained, but the meaning was altered.

In Psychology it is standard knowledge that striking linkages between two ideas can be reversed in value. People taught that "the highest mountain in the world is in Pakistan" is a False statement; then retested after an interval - will more more likely than chance to mark this statement as True - presumably from a sense of familiarity.

Otto said...

Stigler’s law

Another unremarked milestone

According to the latest figures , the pecks have now killed more than two-thirds as many people in Taiwan as the birdemic has, and that rat...