This person holds a Cabinet-level position. (A “non-binary” Minister for Digital Affairs — isn’t that some sort of syntax error?)
What an advertisement for democracy!
Saturday, December 11, 2021
It’s not only the West that’s insane
Taiwan was represented at Joe Schmo’s Summit for Democracy by a long-haired “post-gender” man named Audrey who opened, uh, “her” remarks with “Ladies, gentlemen, and non-binary friends” and closed by saying “Live long and prosper” while giving the Vulcan salute from Star Trek.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Sabbatical notice
I'm taking a break from blogging for a bit, exact timetable undetermined. In the meantime, feel free to contact me by email.
-
Following up on the idea that the pecked are no longer alone in their bodies , reader Ben Pratt has brought to my attention these remarks by... -
Disclaimer: My terms are borrowed (by way of Terry Boardman and Bruce Charlton) from Rudolf Steiner, but I cannot claim to be using them in ... -
1. The traditional Marseille layout Tarot de Marseille decks stick very closely to the following layout for the Bateleur's table. Based ...
6 comments:
Does not compute
By 2024, Life (Globally and especially America) as we know it today
will be in the early stages of being unrecognizable.
Pluto transforms everything that it touches.
The Phoenix that rises out of the ashes.
Audrey is 'her'? I regret to inform you that Taiwan is still behind the curve. The highest rank of post-genderism in English is to be a 'they'. Although I suppose this particular bit of English grammar doesn't translate into Chinese all that well....
As for non-binary digital affairs, perhaps Taiwan is looking to resurrect the Soviet Setun ternary computer https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Setun
Chinese personal pronouns have five grammatical genders (male, female, animal, inanimate, and god), but they're all pronounced exactly the same ("ta"), though written with different characters. Audrey has said ta is so far beyond gender that ta accepts any and all pronouns. So yes, behind the curve. I mean, what's the point of degenderacy without the pronoun policing?
Maybe it is part of a subtle govt. plot to deter the unification project - on the lines of "Think again: do you *really* want to assimilate *this* kind of stuff?"
Post a Comment