Over at The Magician's Table, I comment briefly on the possible Tarot connection.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Popular posts
-
Following up on the idea that the pecked are no longer alone in their bodies , reader Ben Pratt has brought to my attention these remarks by... -
Disclaimer: My terms are borrowed (by way of Terry Boardman and Bruce Charlton) from Rudolf Steiner, but I cannot claim to be using them in ... -
I dreamt that a very large man walked into the lobby of my school. He was maybe six foot six and looked like he weighed well over 400 pounds...
-
It's been a while since I clicked for a randomly selected /x/ thread . I tried it today just in the spirit of "Is this thing on?... -
Over the past few days, I’ve been trying to puzzle out the meaning of "The plant is the three pages just starred by an asterisk," ... -
Just putting this out there, since both the name Amber and the sun have been in the sync-stream. Yesterday, the preschoolers acted out a Chi...
-
I dreamt that my wife bought me breakfast -- an ice-cream come, which I ate very slowly because it was a special kind of ice cream that woul... -
That video ends with questioning the validity of our childhood memories. I then checked my subscriptions and found a new short from Whit cal...
-
Back on August 17, Bruce Charlton posted an episode from the old children's TV show Pipkins (which I had never heard of), in which Hart...
-
I dreamt I had gone to see the Background Brethren in a sold-out concert at Madison Square Garden. (Someone in the audience sitting near me ...
3 comments:
I could still wish those long, deep narrow canyons were handramits.
It could just be that NASA took a ball and discharged electricity on it and took photos of it. Mars is probably a flat LED in the sky.
It is not an implausible let alone impossible idea. As he argued in the video there is a serious incongruence between the posited age of the grand canyon and its dimensions, and the generally accepted theories and ideas about erosion. Electrical theory at large is a problem for the status quo in so many ways that i reckon it will be violently rejected for a while, but a much more fulfilling explanation of the 'mechanics of this realm' paraphrasing Tesla, probably poorly. The recognition of a non-material layer of the universe as fundamental would be a quantum leap forward already (pun partially intended?).
Post a Comment