Over at The Magician's Table, I comment briefly on the possible Tarot connection.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Tin soliders and griffins
Yesterday's post, " The Tinleys and the small key of David ," featured the name T(h)inley in two different contexts. First, t...
-
Following up on the idea that the pecked are no longer alone in their bodies , reader Ben Pratt has brought to my attention these remarks by...
-
In my recently posted notes on John 5:1-18 , I said, "I do not believe the Old Testament contains a single unambiguous reference to Go...
-
1. The traditional Marseille layout Tarot de Marseille decks stick very closely to the following layout for the Bateleur's table. Based ...
3 comments:
I could still wish those long, deep narrow canyons were handramits.
It could just be that NASA took a ball and discharged electricity on it and took photos of it. Mars is probably a flat LED in the sky.
It is not an implausible let alone impossible idea. As he argued in the video there is a serious incongruence between the posited age of the grand canyon and its dimensions, and the generally accepted theories and ideas about erosion. Electrical theory at large is a problem for the status quo in so many ways that i reckon it will be violently rejected for a while, but a much more fulfilling explanation of the 'mechanics of this realm' paraphrasing Tesla, probably poorly. The recognition of a non-material layer of the universe as fundamental would be a quantum leap forward already (pun partially intended?).
Post a Comment