Over at The Magician's Table, I comment briefly on the possible Tarot connection.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Cheerful Charlies, unicorns, Bulls of Heaven, Covi-yale, and the Great Sage
After I'd "saved" a beetle, as told in " The ox of the starry heavens ," I found myself thinking, "I's done...
-
Following up on the idea that the pecked are no longer alone in their bodies , reader Ben Pratt has brought to my attention these remarks by... -
Disclaimer: My terms are borrowed (by way of Terry Boardman and Bruce Charlton) from Rudolf Steiner, but I cannot claim to be using them in ... -
Just because you can do something with technology doesn’t mean you should. The other day, being out and about rather early in the morning, I...
3 comments:
I could still wish those long, deep narrow canyons were handramits.
It could just be that NASA took a ball and discharged electricity on it and took photos of it. Mars is probably a flat LED in the sky.
It is not an implausible let alone impossible idea. As he argued in the video there is a serious incongruence between the posited age of the grand canyon and its dimensions, and the generally accepted theories and ideas about erosion. Electrical theory at large is a problem for the status quo in so many ways that i reckon it will be violently rejected for a while, but a much more fulfilling explanation of the 'mechanics of this realm' paraphrasing Tesla, probably poorly. The recognition of a non-material layer of the universe as fundamental would be a quantum leap forward already (pun partially intended?).
Post a Comment