Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
My 2008 Wikimancy fail, plus Gris Roslo and Deornoch Knod
In principle, anything "random" can serve as a modality of divination. Thus, the art of Wikimancy consists of posing a question, c...
-
Following up on the idea that the pecked are no longer alone in their bodies , reader Ben Pratt has brought to my attention these remarks by... -
Disclaimer: My terms are borrowed (by way of Terry Boardman and Bruce Charlton) from Rudolf Steiner, but I cannot claim to be using them in ... -
It's been a while since I clicked for a randomly selected /x/ thread . I tried it today just in the spirit of "Is this thing on?...
2 comments:
I wonder if he wrote it upside down (for him, facing the accusers) making it even cooler.
I agree with what you wrote towards the end; it's about how a person is motivated in the moment. Is the person internally-clear rather than corruption-animated (envy, resentment, etc). So the whole question of what to do with the adulteress is illegitimate because corruption-motivated by the accusers.
Careful, ben, you'll get me started on ambigrams again.
Post a Comment