I put russell brand into Google to try to get context for a Babylon Bee article, and I added a new word to my vocabulary.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Popular posts
-
Following up on the idea that the pecked are no longer alone in their bodies , reader Ben Pratt has brought to my attention these remarks by... -
In a comment on " Drill, baby, drill! " Bill writes, referring to my posts about the poem by Christina Rossetti: The last, and it ... -
“ Turnum outknaves all three ” sent me back to my 2023 dream post “ Narrative Reasoning ,” which begins with a quote from Turnus and ends wi...
-
But Men shall remember Atlantis's name Come hell or high water! Sith both of them came, It rests unforgotten, and what we now tell Skill...
-
It's been a while since I clicked for a randomly selected /x/ thread . I tried it today just in the spirit of "Is this thing on?... -
Mark your calendars, and in the meantime find something else to read. Note added: For those who have asked, nothing is wrong, and my decisi... -
Back on August 17, Bruce Charlton posted an episode from the old children's TV show Pipkins (which I had never heard of), in which Hart...
-
My mention of a "Buddhist text" in my last post was probably misleading, making it sound like I was poring over Mahayana scriptur... -
In a comment on " Ascending to the black star ," Bill brought up a game called The Blue Prince , and so on a random whim I searche... -
This morning, a preschooler dropped a case of alphabet stamps. These had been in alphabetical order, but when he picked them up, he paid no ...
1 comment:
OED seems pretty conclusive that this form of the word has been obsolete for 300 years; however, I noticed this absurd AI-written article from "your trusted source for expert grammar guidance and writing tips" seems a bit more open minded: https://thecontentauthority.com/blog/baptization-vs-baptize
Post a Comment