Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
A delayed reaction to Isaiah
I was able to salvage very little of this dream from the evanescence of memory upon waking, but I know that I was reading a text and simulta...
-
Following up on the idea that the pecked are no longer alone in their bodies , reader Ben Pratt has brought to my attention these remarks by...
-
Disclaimer: My terms are borrowed (by way of Terry Boardman and Bruce Charlton) from Rudolf Steiner, but I cannot claim to be using them in ...
-
It's been a while since I clicked for a randomly selected /x/ thread . I tried it today just in the spirit of "Is this thing on?...
4 comments:
But the Duke of Earl could not be stopped from using Any restroom he wanted.
That's true. Because he's the Duke of Earl.
I was playing his song and tried to stop it, but was forced to listen till the end, because nobody can stop the Duke of Earl.
Those fact checkers need to check their facts.
The Duke of Earl does not assert that no one can stop him. He implies that NOTHING can stop him. Just because those materialist propagandists want to equate living, sentient personages as "things" logically doesn't mean we have to you. He merely asserts that no one can harm you in his presence. He leaves the door wide open for someone stopping him via means not involving things. For example, shouting "Stop, Duke!" might work uttered in a sufficiently authoritative tone.
Post a Comment